home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
500 MB Nyheder Direkte fra Internet 5
/
500 MB nyheder direkte fra internet CD 5.iso
/
start
/
zipped
/
dos
/
text
/
v22n22g.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-05-24
|
28KB
|
696 lines
The GUS Daily Digest Wednesday, 24 May 1995 Volume 22 : Number 022
Today's Topics:
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #17
Pmode/w, DRAM test, channel 10 prg change, Win95, NT, Interwave
MIDI cable
Re: Interwave, Win 95 and such...
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Re: Interwave
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Ultrinit question
Re: The g-list: Where?
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Microsoft
Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
Win95vsOS/2 shit thread
Diskworld?
Standard Info:
- Meta-info about the GUS can be found at the end of the Digest.
- Before you ask a question, please READ THE FAQ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Matt@machine.demon.co.uk (Matt Robinson)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 09:57:18 GMT
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
> From: csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu (John Wallace)
> Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 15:22:56 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: Re: awe32, win95 + other operating systems games & sound support
> One final note:
> A friend of mine writes software for the NT platform, and he calls
> Win95 pure trash, and he says that NT is THE Microsoft OS of the future.
> I believe him. I don't know what you would call Win95, but if I were
> you I sure wouldn't buy it when it first comes out. To hell with the hype.
> If you must buy a new OS soon, and you don't want OS/2, buy NT 3.5.
> Forget Win95.
NT 3.5 requires a MINIMUN of 12Mb of ram, 16 to run comfortably. It's no quicker
than Win95, and win95 runs NT programs. So why should I change? I use Netscape
1.1N 32-bit, and it uses only 3% system resources. The applets however ARE crap.
Wordpad takes over 40seconds to load, whereas WordPerfect 6.0a will load up
completely (30Meg) in 17 seconds. Don't try and tell me what OS I need, if I'm
wrong, then you're happy, I'm not out of pocket, I can still run NT stuff, and
win 3.11 stuff, and DOS stuff, I can't see any significant advantage of NT over
win95. Isn't it better to talk about the GUS instead? You know, this IS a Gus
mailing list.
>
> From: csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu (John Wallace)
> Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 17:29:42 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: Computer espionage by M$ (fwd)
> Microsoft officials confirm that beta versions of Windows 95 include a
> small viral routine called Registration Wizard. It interrogates every
> system on a network gathering intelligence on what software is being run
> on which machine. It then creates a complete listing of both Microsoft's
> and competitors' products by machine, which it reports to Microsoft when
> customers sign up for Microsoft's Network Services, due for launch later
> this year.
When I completed my registration, the "viral routine" kicked in (on screen),
with a dialogue box telling me what it was doing. It then presented it to me on
the screen, and said that this information would be useful to them, and asked if
it could send it with the registration. I see nothing sneaky about that. It DID
ask, after all.
> An update on this. A friend of mine got hold of a copy of the beta test CD
> of Win95, and set up a packet sniffer between his serial port and the
> modem. When you try out the free demo time on The Microsoft Network, it
> transmits your entire directory structure in background.
Only if you asked. It'd be nice if it actually told you on screen, "Sending your
complete directory structure to M$" but I think it'd make some people panic.
> This means that they have a list of every directory (and, potentially every
> file) on your machine. It would not be difficult to have something like a
> FileRequest from your system to theirs, without you knowing about it. This
> way they could get ahold of any juicy routines you've written yourself and
> claim them as their own if you don't have them copyrighted.
Well I think you WOULD notice that your phone had been connected for 15 minutes
sending only a 2k file.
> Needless to say, I'm rather annoyed about this.
>
> So spread the word as far and wide as possible: Steer clear of Windows 95.
> There's nothing to say that this "feature" will be removed in the final
> release.
There's nothing to say that it won't be removed. With the Beta, you are testing
the software and reporting bugs to M$, if you send a bug report, it only makes
sense that M$ know what computer the fault occurs on, and with which software.
Now stop invading the mailing list with irrelevant material. (please).
Matt
- --
- ----sig not included 'cos I can't be bothered-----
------------------------------
From: engineer@mail.soc.staffs.ac.uk (Ian Silvester)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 12:37:18 +0100
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #17
>
>From: Okan Tuncer <otuncer@mktrpost.turkey.NCR.COM>
>Date: Thu, 18 May 95 13:50:00 PDT
>Subject: Recording MIDI from same computer
>
>Hi GUSers,
>
>Here is a weird question for you;
>
>Can I play a MIDI song in one sequencer, and record in another in the same
>computer? For example while playing a song in Recording Session can I record
>the same song in Power Chords Pro?
>
>WHY? Simple: Because in Recording Session I have the ability to change
>volume and panning on-line but this feature is just for playback, i.e. it is
>not recorded (as far as I know). It is time-consuming to insert a gradual
>panning effect, surely recording it above mentioned way would be much much
>better (if technically possible).
>
I think you could do this (play in one sequencer, record in another) but I
think you'll find this won't achieve the effect you're after. I don't think
the pans and fades you do using the mixer within Recording Session will be
sent as MIDI data, and therefore won't be recorded into any other MIDI package.
Yan.
- ------------------------- --------------------------------------
Ian Silvester, Phone: +44 (0)1785 353348
Research Associate, Fax: +44 (0)1785 353331
School Of Engineering, "He dreams... while he's not sleeping"
Staffordshire University. - The Chameleons
- ------------------------- --------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: Sam <Samuel.Marshall@durham.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 14:16:20 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Pmode/w, DRAM test, channel 10 prg change, Win95, NT, Interwave
Another long message. Sorry.
> pmw116.zip - DOS extender for programmers? Not for GUS archive!
I think it's there because it fixes GUS support with some DOS-4GW games
(in particular, allows the use of IRQ 11)
> Does anyone know of any software that will do a complete check on all the
> GUS DRAM I have installed ??..
Didn't it come with the card? I'm sure there is some...
> Source code would be helpfull ??
Writing your own is VERY easy, I mean you only have to poke and peek a
byte to every location.
> Subject: Re: Program change on channel 10
I got this wrong earlier (said it changed drum *pattern*). Apparently it
only does this on some Yamaha drum machines and crap home keyboards.
Sorry. The answers everyone else is giving are correct ;)
> have bugs. So, is everyone just supposed to wait until 1997 to develop any
> new games?
No, game development can start now. I'm not a professional developer, yet
at home there is a Win95 beta and a development software package that
supports Win95 and runs natively under it.
Don't forget, games aren't written overnight. In my opinion, it's likely
that Win95 will be out by the end of the year, or if not, then in the
first quarter of next year.
> It seems like both OS/2 users & GUS users have more in common with
> each other than they might care to admit. Both products are excellent
> and both have less than average support from software developers.
Well, some GUS users have tried OS/2 and disagree that it's "excellent".
However, the situation for GUS is rather better than OS/2 as far as native
support goes; over half of the major new games come with native GUS
support. (OS/2 emulation is more successful though ;> )
> A friend of mine writes software for the NT platform, and he calls
> Win95 pure trash, and he says that NT is THE Microsoft OS of the future.
This is MS's plan as well. Win95 is a stepping stone to next-version NT
which was necessary to get 32-bit apps written. (Is the way I read it).
However Win95 has *FAR* superior games, fast graphics, and soundcard
support. It's mostly in vapourware at the moment, but they are committed
to this for release.
> you I sure wouldn't buy it when it first comes out. To hell with the hype.
> If you must buy a new OS soon, and you don't want OS/2, buy NT 3.5.
> Forget Win95.
Forget NT. No GUS support at all and virtually no hope of it, either.
This is the GUS digest, remember...
> This is a strange response of the Interwave chip. Wouldn't it not matter
> if Gravis doesn't release drivers for their Interwave-based card on time
> when there are drivers for other Interwave-based cards? Wouldn't drivers
> for other Interwave-based cards work for Gravis' Interwave-based cards?
Does anyone know whether, as I thought might be possible, Gravis are
doing drivers for the Interwave chip, which will be licensed by other
users of the chip?
> Thankyou for your views on the AMD Interwave. I have posted twice to
> the GUS Digest asking who knows for sure if Gravis will be using the
> AMD Chip, and also discussing the possibility that the Interwave chip
> will NOT be exclusively used by Gravis. Until now the only discussion
And you got confirmation a few days ago from someone who said they'd
phoned Gravis or something and that Gravis's Ultrasound Interwave would
be out September. Of course, it will not be exclusively used by Gravis.
For starters, AMD licensed it thinking partly of a one-chip motherboard
sound solution, I thought.
> GUS- espousing the *fact* that ofcourse the chip would be used in the
> next GUS- proof coming from the claim that Gravis has licensed the GF1
Well, according to someone, Gravis say it will be used in the next GUS.
Sounds like a fact to me. (They'd be insane not to use it, anyway).
> chip design to AMD as a basis for the Interwave. Gravis probably did
> license the GF1 design to AMD, but doesn't that give AMD the right to
> do what it likes with its new chip?
"Probably"? I got that info years ago from PC Week, which is a reputable
publication. (ok, I guess they make mistakes, but obviously that wasn't one).
What would AMD do other than sell it to anyone who wants? They are a chip
manufacturer!
> >From the specs published by AMD, it looks more and more like Mr P.Chen
> is absolutely right in his assertion that other major players like C.L.
> etc are likely to use the same device in their offerings. There are
> even rumours that some motherboard OEMs are looking to add the
> Interwave directly.
Motherboards... I think this is the reason why AMD licensed GF1
initially... and CL will almost certainly *not* be using it! They have
their *own* professional quality music company! Why would they pay to
license chips from another company!
> performance, quality, price and support, but would you rush out and buy
> the next GUS just because of some religious devotion?
No.
Sam
------------------------------
From: mike@math.amu.edu.pl (Michal Wiernowolski)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 15:20:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: MIDI cable
Hi,
Could anyone tell me if the MIDI cable for SoundBlaster compatilble
cards works with GUS. I want to connect an external MIDI keyboard, but
don't want to experiment with my computer. I've read several info's on
the subject (including GUS FAQ), and in my opinion there is a
difference in pin assignments between GUS and SB.
Please respond if you have any experience with GUS MIDI port. It
bothers me for some time.
Thanks in advance,
Michal Wiernowolski
------------------------------
From: Bryan Maher <bsm@SEI.CMU.EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 May 95 09:24:49 EDT
Subject: Re: Interwave, Win 95 and such...
Sorry for this not-so-gus-related response...
>This is a strange response of the Interwave chip. Wouldn't it not matter
>if Gravis doesn't release drivers for their Interwave-based card on time
>when there are drivers for other Interwave-based cards? Wouldn't drivers
>for other Interwave-based cards work for Gravis' Interwave-based cards?
>If all SB-based cards (100% hardware compatible that is) work with the
>same driver, then wouldn't make sense for all Interwave-based cards to
>work with the same driver?
Take a look at the video industry... Diamond Multimedia uses standard chips
manufactured by S3 Corp. and Weitek. In fact, many companies use these chips
and in MOST cases the drives for a particular chip are completely
interchangeable across brand names. Why? The actual chip manufacturer created
the drivers and the BIOS specifications and provides it to those who use their
product. Why did I mention DIAMOND? They are an exception. Diamond is never
happy with the performance of the native drivers and BIOS so they always
rewrite them (as do others... not intended as a particular flame :) The result
is that the usual drivers are not interchangeable with Diamond's products and
you must always go back to them for the latest revisions. Game (software)
support suffers since developers are inclined to develop for standards.
Still, AMD will no doubt publish a standard hardware interface and API for
their Interwave chip. AMD has far more resouces and experience in this area
than Gravis so the design will be very good. This in turn should encourage
other companies to adopt the Interwave as a complete sound solution. The more
companies to get on the bandwagon, the better game/software support we see in
the future.
Heres hoping EVERYONE sails on the good ship Interwave!
Bryan Maher.
------------------------------
From: csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu (John Wallace)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 09:18:53 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
>
> NT 3.5 requires a MINIMUN of 12Mb of ram, 16 to run comfortably. It's no quicker
> than Win95, and win95 runs NT programs. So why should I change? I use Netscape
Well, if is speed you're looking for why not stick with DOS?
I hate to tell you, but you'll need at least 12MB for Win95 to run well.
> 1.1N 32-bit, and it uses only 3% system resources. The applets however ARE crap.
> Wordpad takes over 40seconds to load, whereas WordPerfect 6.0a will load up
> completely (30Meg) in 17 seconds. Don't try and tell me what OS I need, if I'm
> wrong, then you're happy, I'm not out of pocket, I can still run NT stuff, and
I don't care what OS you use.
> win 3.11 stuff, and DOS stuff, I can't see any significant advantage of NT over
> win95. Isn't it better to talk about the GUS instead? You know, this IS a Gus
> mailing list.
True, but I have noticed discussions about operating systems here.
NT is a true 32-bit multitasking, multithreaded OS. Win95 has some
32-bit components, but still has the old 16-bit base to it. I have
seen it referred to as a Windows 3.11 on steroids in some publications.
One advantage NT has over Win95 is that you can run a full screen DOS
application in NT without causing background applications to suffer.
For example: playing a game like Descent while downloading a
file at 14.4 or 28.8. You can't do that under Win95. Also, NT has
some crash protection to it - it is almost impossible for a bad
application running under NT to bring the whole system down as it could
running under Win95. This has to do with how the operating system
was designed, not what it looks like or what it can run. NT is an
example of good robust software engineering from the ground up.
Win95 was built using existing DOS & Windows as a base.
True, this is a GUS newsgroup, but since our software to power the
GUS is dependent on an operating system to function, doesn't it make
sense that we should be interested in how well the operating system
can function?
Vince, am I out of line here?
I am still pretty new to this listserver.
- --
(John Wallace || csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu) && Team OS/2
------------------------------
From: gt0074b@prism.gatech.edu (P.Chen)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 10:21:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Interwave
>From: George <gmontem@mercury.sfsu.edu>
>Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 14:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #20
>
>> From: gt0074b@prism.gatech.edu (P.Chen)
>> name sound card producers start using the Interwave. Sure, I'm
>> brand loyal, but not blindly so.
>> People want drivers for different OS's, as we can tell from the
>> cries of despair posted here. If Gravis can't provide the drivers
>> and/or support, I'm buying another Interwave-based card from a
>
>[rest deleted]
>
>This is a strange response of the Interwave chip. Wouldn't it not matter
>if Gravis doesn't release drivers for their Interwave-based card on time
>when there are drivers for other Interwave-based cards? Wouldn't drivers
>for other Interwave-based cards work for Gravis' Interwave-based cards?
[deleted]
My point EXACTLY. Finally, with an open standard and competition,
software support (and drivers) will exist! Whoever makes the driver first
(be it CL, Gravis, Micro Soft) will have an edge, especially if it's a
sound card manufacturer. If this other sound card producer has the first
drivers, their cards would come with them, making them much more appealing.
Of course, you could pirate them and use them with other compatible cards,
but the point is, drivers will exist for all platforms (hopefully). Such is
the beauty of a standardized chipset.
------------------------------
From: Phat Hong Tran <phtran@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 11:27:03 -0400
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
On Tue, 23 May 1995, The GUS Daily Digest wrote:
> From: Daryl James <darylj@microsoft.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 May 95 09:03:49 TZ
> Subject: RE: Interwave - an answer to our dreams
>
> Dear P. Chen,
>
> Thankyou for your views on the AMD Interwave. I have posted twice to
> the GUS Digest asking who knows for sure if Gravis will be using the
> AMD Chip, and also discussing the possibility that the Interwave chip
> will NOT be exclusively used by Gravis. Until now the only discussion
> on this topic has been from some almost religiously blind believers in
> GUS- espousing the *fact* that ofcourse the chip would be used in the
> next GUS- proof coming from the claim that Gravis has licensed the GF1
> chip design to AMD as a basis for the Interwave. Gravis probably did
> license the GF1 design to AMD, but doesn't that give AMD the right to
> do what it likes with its new chip?
Disclaimer: I've been out of the Gravis scene for quite a while, so my
information may be a bit stale.
The agreement Gravis forged with AMD was a technology _exchange_. AMD
would get the GF1 to build upon, and Gravis would get first dibs on the
chip AMD produces. Assuming that critical deadlines were not missed
causing the agreement to fall through, Gravis should have gotten a
headstart on everyone else in designing a new board around the Amadeus
chip. I have no idea when we should expect such a card from Gravis,
though. It may be a while coming yet.
Phat.
------------------------------
From: bresler@bart.chem-eng.nwu.edu (Leo Bresler)
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 11:00:16 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Ultrinit question
Hello, GUS'ers!
I'm a little confused about ultrinit which came with gus411.zip. It's
version 2.28a, but it's dated later than version 2.31 which was released in
gus047(?).
Which is the version I should use? Or do they have slightly different
functionality?
Thanks
Leo
bresler@nwu.edu
------------------------------
From: Nathan Tracy <ntracy@u.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 10:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The g-list: Where?
Fredrik,
You're looking for the famous G-List. The only place I know for sure=20
that you can get it is on CompuServe in the PCVENB forum. They only put=20
it there infrequently however, as the most recent issue is March 8,=20
1995. I recall it being posted on several sites on the World Wide Web=20
and FTP, but the locations escape me.
Nathan Tracy
On Mon, 22 May 1995, ETX-T-BEE Liden Fredrik wrote:
> Hi all fellow GUS-users!
>=20
> I've heard it mentioned that there is a list of how to get various
> games to work with the GUS & GUSMAX. Does anybody know where this
> list can be found? It was referred to as the "glist" last I saw it
> mentioned... I haven't been able to locate it on any ftp sites yet :(
> If there is such a list I would expect that a lot of people would be
> interested in it - why not upload it to an ftp site and post the path
> to the digest!?
>=20
> Thanks // Fredrik Lid=E9n (etxcfl@kk.ericsson.se)
>=20
------------------------------
From: "Peter C. Chien Jr." <pchienjr@ocf.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 13:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
I am now trying to try out the SAW3DEMO, but it doesn't seem to work with
the regular GUS. I am guessing that SAW is trying to record in 16-bit
resolution, but the regular GUS can only record in 8-bit. For now, is
there a way to tell SAW to record in 8-bit. Or any way to get it to
record with the regular GUS? It would make a superior alternative to a
4-track recorder if a) it works with the GUS directly, and b) it doesn't
cost so much! Thanks.
-Peter
------------------------------
From: "Peter C. Chien Jr." <pchienjr@ocf.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 13:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
I am now trying to try out the SAW3DEMO, but it doesn't seem to work with
the regular GUS. I am guessing that SAW is trying to record in 16-bit
resolution, but the regular GUS can only record in 8-bit. For now, is
there a way to tell SAW to record in 8-bit. Or any way to get it to
record with the regular GUS? It would make a superior alternative to a
4-track recorder if a) it works with the GUS directly, and b) it doesn't
cost so much! Thanks.
-Peter
------------------------------
From: gould@cs.bris.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 22:10:54 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
People keep talking about operating systems in this digest - I am trying to
respond directly to save earache for everyone else.
Can you people do the same?
Dave.
------------------------------
From: gould@cs.bris.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 22:28:40 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Microsoft
> An update on this. A friend of mine got hold of a copy of the beta test CD
> of Win95, and set up a packet sniffer between his serial port and the
> modem. When you try out the free demo time on The Microsoft Network, it
> transmits your entire directory structure in background.
>
> This means that they have a list of every directory (and, potentially every
> file) on your machine. It would not be difficult to have something like a
> FileRequest from your system to theirs, without you knowing about it. This
> way they could get ahold of any juicy routines you've written yourself and
> claim them as their own if you don't have them copyrighted.
>
> Needless to say, I'm rather annoyed about this.
>
> So spread the word as far and wide as possible: Steer clear of Windows 95.
> There's nothing to say that this "feature" will be removed in the final
> release.
I don't believe this for a minute. It is:
a) illegal
b) immoral
c) typical....
It's about time something was done about this sort of thing. We are going to
see 1984 very shortly if this continues.
Dave.
------------------------------
From: markus@nbnet.nb.ca (Jurassic Mark)
Date: Tue, 23 May 95 18:17:34 EDT
Subject: Re: The GUS Daily Digest V22 #21
>Please, Gravis. There are 3 million of us out here who don't have a real
>sound card to choose from with OS/2. That's not an insignificant market.
>
>Bryan Maher
Let me add my voice to yours. Gravis! Give us a sign! Even if it's
to say "we're still working on it". And what happened to the usual
"Just To Let You Know" series? You seem to have completely
disappeared!
Jurassic Mark (Marc Y. Paulin)
Mail: markus@nbnet.nb.ca - IRC: J-Mark
WARPing and GUSsing!!!
------------------------------
From: markus@nbnet.nb.ca (Jurassic Mark)
Date: Tue, 23 May 95 18:28:21 EDT
Subject: Win95vsOS/2 shit thread
>The implications of this action, and the attitude of Microsoft to plan
>such action, beggars the imagination.
>
>Chris Norloff cnorloff@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil
Who cares!?!? This is the GUS digest. Not the OS/2 mailing list.
Stick to the topic, dude.
Jurassic Mark (Marc Y. Paulin)
Mail: markus@nbnet.nb.ca - IRC: J-Mark
WARPing and GUSsing!!!
------------------------------
From: billf@wam.umd.edu
Date: Tue, 23 May 95 22:38:12 PDT
Subject: Diskworld?
Has anyone had any luck getting Diskworld to work with the included
drivers? I was able to set the game up for "ultrasound" but when I try to
run the game it promptly locks up. I tried SBOS (old version) but nada.
It locks up also.
I thought I saw some discussion on this game a few weeks back but I didn't
pay attention to it at the time. If anyone does know how to get the game
to work feel free to write me directly or post to the digest.
*************billf@wam.umd.edu****************
* *
*********** This space for Rent***************
------------------------------
End of The GUS Daily Digest V22 #22
***********************************
To post to tomorrow's digest: <gus-general@mail.orst.edu>
To (un)subscribe or get help: <gus-general-digest-request@mail.orst.edu>
To contact a human (last resort): <gus-general-digest-owner@mail.orst.edu>
FTP Sites Archive Directories
--------- -------------------
Main N.American Site: ftp.orst.edu pub/packages/gravis
wuarchive.wustl.edu systems/ibmpc/ultrasound
Main Asian Site: nctuccca.edu.tw PC/ultrasound
Main European Site: src.doc.ic.ac.uk packages/ultrasound
Main Australian Site: ftp.mpx.com.au /ultrasound/general
/ultrasound/submit
South African Site: ftp.sun.ac.za /pub/packages/ultrasound
Submissions: archive.epas.utoronto.ca pub/pc/ultrasound/submit
Newly Validated Files: archive.epas.utoronto.ca pub/pc/ultrasound
Mirrors: garbo.uwasa.fi mirror/ultrasound
ftp.st.nepean.uws.edu.au pc/ultrasound
ftp.luth.se pub/msdos/ultrasound
Gopher Sites Menu directory
------------ --------------
Main Site: src.doc.ic.ac.uk packages/ultrasound
WWW Pages
---------
Main Site: http://www.xmission.com/~grue/gus.html
Main European Site: http://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/ultrasound/
Main Australian Site: http://ftp.mpx.com.au/archive/ultrasound/general/
http://ftp.mpx.com.au/archive/ultrasound/submit/
http://ftp.mpx.com.au/gravis.html
Mirrors: http://www.st.nepean.uws.edu.au/pub/pc/ultrasound/
GUS Digest Archives: http://gpu.srv.ualberta.ca/~itam/digest.html
http://www.student.adelaide.edu.au/~godfathr/gus/gus.html
MailServer For Archive Access: Email to <ftpmail@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Hints:
- Get the FAQ from the FTP sites or the request server.
- Mail to <gus-general-digest-request@mail.orst.edu> for info about
other GUS related mailing lists (programmers, musicians, etc.).